Folders should not be a "luxury" item. I've tried to get several of my project teams (independent entities all) to use the OLW workspace. It's hard enough to get technophobes and troglodytes to use an "enterprise space," which freaks them out, and then expect them to sift through HUNDREDS of unsorted documents to find what you've updated, instead of effectively "hand-delivering" the document to them via email. Don't you OLW folks see the impossibility of using OLW professionally, if nested folders are not an option?
On any given project, I will have literally dozens of versions of dozens of documents. I am required to keep those versions. Those multi-version documents, coupled with hundreds of reference documents (pdfs of various things, for example, including MS Project, which isn't OLW-supported - could you get with the program on THAT, as well?), will rapidly make OLW absolutely unusable. It would be fine for somebody's family page, or some other non-professional usage, but the inabilty to organize massive, document-heavy projects/tasks, renders it - frankly - worthless for someone like me, who really WANTS to use OLW. I want to introduce my myriad clients to OLW...but what's the point if they are only going to become frustrated and infuriated with me for making their lives harder, not easier? I for one would not mind paying for this level of professional usability.
And while I realize that you are highly reluctant to support Adobe in ANY way, would it really kill Microsoft to make it at least POSSIBLE to print a pdf file from within OLW? PDF's are totally unsupported, so uploading them to OLW provides naught but online reading capability of pdf's. My clients can't even download them to their own computer and THEN print them, so it's easier for me to FTP them via Skype or simply email them, than to use OLW.
Come on, guys...I'm trying to use and support OLW. How about a little professional-usability-love in return?
Hitch